Buy Yourself a Bit of Casino

There are companies which are jacks of all trades – own soft, casino, betting, poker… The two of the most well-known companies in this category are presented in the market. In June of 2005 PartyGaming (LSE: PRTY) came into the market as the operator of the popular PartyPoker along with a host of casinos (later betting, bingo, financial trading and bingo were also added). Starting with shares of PS1,350, they gained in price up to PS1,730, which led to the total company costs of over $10 bln – an all-time record that will doubtfully beaten soon! But after bouncing the Americans back in the year 2006 the costs dropped several times.

Currently, the share price is only PS230 with a total cost of around PS1 billion (or $1.5 bln). The world greatest on-line casino (also with its own soft, as well as a poker room, and later, other games of chance were later added) – Casino on Online, and to be precise, it’s called 888 Plc. The company was corporatized just a few months later.

First, the shares also were priced higher, between PS170 to PS230 However, the year 2006 didn’t spare it either, though the effect was not as severe, as for Party. It is interesting to note that the Company experienced a significant drop-down in the early spring of 2010, and in the present, the shares cost PS44 that gives the capitalization of just PS150 millions (and it was higher than $1 bln). Visit:-

There aren’t any companies that specialize in online casinos, that are listed on the stock-market. Two of them that are specific; they both joined the market in 2005, the year popular for taking on-line companies to the stock-exchange. Both experienced the effects of bouncing the Americans (though the latter had been focused on European markets) as well as the costs of their shares were comparable. In the general sense, the first online casino to be corporatized to be corporatized was Gaming VC company (LSE: GVC) more popularly known as Casino Club, one of the leading players on the German-speaking market and also among the roulette fans. Like with many others after the announcement of shares, their growth was witnessed (from PS450 up to PS870), but the famous 2006 and the restriction on the Americans in the US to play roulette have dropped the shares multiple times – to PS100. Following that, the shares have been gradually increasing, reaching PS200 but the decline in the final months has decreased the price to PS110. At that, the company capitalization amounts to PS35 millions.

Our second hero is 32 Red Company (LSE: TTR), owning a 32Red casino online in the exact same title (then they have acquired several more casinos, and also recently, they have presented the stakes). Beginning at PS130 In 2006, the shares dropped to PS26 and then, after a rise, the world crisis arrived with new drop-downs, and now the shares are priced at PS15 as well as the whole business – PS10 millions.

In the end, let’s review the major diversified players in a quick glance. They are mainly being European off-line bookmakers that have an online presence that is strong and offering not just bets however, they also offer online casinos as well as bingo rooms, poker lotteries, and other. I’ll point out several most relevant names in this group: William Hill (LSE: WMH), Ladbrokes (LSE: LAD), BWin (Vienna: BWIN), Paddy Power (LSE: PAP). They all cost the sum of 1.2 billion, however, the first one is in pounds and the second has Euros (now, the pound is 20-30% heavier over Euro). Such companies as SportingBet, Bettson, Unibet etc. are valued at around one hundred million. The cost of these companies typically is on the purchase of a few tens – a couple of hundred pounds or euros, roughly. The price of these businesses has fluctuated significantly over the last years, though the year 2006 did not significantly affect the value of these companies’ shares, since they were initially focusing on Europe and the dominant portion of the cost, in all cases, is comprised of the off-line aspect of the business. For some time, Paddy Power and Bettson have shown not too bad results among the mentioned companies, in spite of the financial crisis.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *